Modulation of TNF-α, interleukin-6, and interleukin-10 by nebivolol-valsartan and nebivolol-lisinopril polytherapy in SHR rats.

Antihypertensive drug therapies have demonstrated their capacity to modulate the inflammatory processes associated with hypertension, leading to improvements in disease progression. Given the prevalent use of polytherapy in treating most hypertensive patients, comprehending the time-dependent effects of combination treatments on inflammation becomes imperative. In this study, spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) were divided into seven groups (n = 6): (i) SHR + vehicle, (ii) SHR + nebivolol, (iii) SHR + valsartan, (iv) SHR + lisinopril, (v) SHR + nebivolol-valsartan, (vi) SHR + nebivolol-lisinopril, and (vii) WKY + vehicle. Blood pressure was measured using the tail-cuff method. Temporal alterations in inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10 were assessed in serum through ELISA and mRNA expression in aortic tissue via qPCR after 1, 2, and 4 weeks of treatment with nebivolol, lisinopril, valsartan, and their respective combinations. Histological alterations in the aorta were assessed. The findings indicated that combined treatments reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure in SHR. The nebivolol and lisinopril combination demonstrated a significant decrease in IL-6 serum and mRNA expression at both 1 week and 4 weeks into the treatment. Additionally, TNF-α mRNA expression also showed a reduction with this combination at the same time points. Particularly, nebivolol-valsartan significantly decreased TNF-α serum and mRNA expression after one and four weeks of treatment. Furthermore, an elevation in serum IL-10 levels was observed with both combination treatments starting from the second week onwards. This study provides compelling evidence that concurrent administration of nebivolol with lisinopril or valsartan exerts time-dependent effects, reducing proinflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-6 while modifying IL-10 levels in an experimental hypertensive model.

A Novel Strategy for the Discovery of Drug Targets: Integrating Clinical Evidence with Molecular Studies.

The mechanisms of several drugs remain unclear, limiting our understanding of how they exert their effects. Receptor affinities have not been comprehensively measured during drug development, and the safety investigations in humans are limited. Therefore, numerous unknown adverse and beneficial effects of drugs in humans persist. In this review, I highlight our achievements in identifying the unexpected beneficial effects of drugs through the analysis of real-world clinical data, which can contribute to drug repositioning and target finding. (1) Through the analysis of real-world data, we found that the anti-arrhythmic amiodarone induced interstitial lung disease, leading to fibrosis. Surprisingly, concurrent use of an anti-thrombin drug, dabigatran mitigated these adverse events. Pharmacological studies using animal models have mimicked this phenomenon and revealed the molecular mechanisms associated with the platelet-derived growth factor-alpha receptors. (2) The antidiabetic dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 inhibitors increased the risk of an autoimmune disease, bullous pemphigoid, which was reduced by the concomitant use of lisinopril. Pharmacological studies using human peripheral blood mononuclear cells have revealed that lisinopril suppressed the skin disorders by inhibiting the expression of cutaneous matrix metalloproteinase 9 in macrophages. (3) The antimicrobial fluoroquinolones increased the risk of tendinopathy, which was reduced by the concomitant use of dexamethasone. However, clinical guidelines have suggested that corticosteroid increases the risk of tendinopathy. Our investigation demonstrated that fluoroquinolones impaired tendon cells through DNA damage by generating reactive oxygen species. In contrast, dexamethasone exhibited an acute beneficial effect on tendon tissue by upregulating the expression of a radical scavenger, glutathione peroxidase 3.

Captopril to Lisinopril Conversion in Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery Patients Less Than 7 Years of Age (RISE-7).

Hypertension after cardiothoracic surgery is common, often requiring pharmacologic management. The recommended first-line antihypertensives in pediatrics are angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. Captopril and enalapril are approved for infants and children; however, lisinopril is only approved for > 7 years of age. This study evaluated safety and efficacy of converting from captopril to lisinopril in patients utilizing a pre-defined conversion of 3 mg captopril to 1 mg lisinopril. This was a single center, retrospective study including patients less than 7 years of age admitted for cardiothoracic surgery who received both captopril and lisinopril from 01/01/2017 to 06/01/2022.The primary outcome was mean change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) from baseline for 72 h after conversion of captopril to lisinopril. A total of 99 patients were enrolled. There was a significant decrease in mean SBP (99.12 mmHg vs 94.86 mmHg; p = 0.007) with no difference in DBP (59.23 mmHg vs 61.95 mmHg; p = 0.07) after conversion to lisinopril. Of the 99 patients who were transitioned to lisinopril, 79 (80%) had controlled SBP, 20 (20%) remained hypertensive, 13 (13%) received an increase in their lisinopril dose, and 2 (2%) required an additional antihypertensive agent. There was a low overall rate of AKI (3%) and hyperkalemia (4%) respectively. This study demonstrates that utilizing lisinopril with a conversion rate of 3 mg of captopril to 1 mg of lisinopril was safe and effective for controlling hypertension in pediatric patients following cardiothoracic surgery.

MANAGEMENT OF RISKS OF ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS ACCORDING TO ADR REPORT FORM DATA FROM LVIV REGION HEALTHCARE FACILITIES IN 2022.

The study aimed to analyse the adverse drug reactions report form data received by the State Expert Center of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine from healthcare professionals in the Lviv region in 2022. Regarding specific types of medicines, the ones with proven cause-and-effect relationships that caused the highest frequency of adverse drug reactions incidents were chemotherapeutic agents (35.5%), medicines affecting the cardiovascular system (20.3%), and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (8%). Within the penicillin class, amoxicillin potentiated by clavulanate (67%) and amoxicillin (29%) were the dominant drugs showing the highest incidence rate of adverse reactions. Among cephalosporins, ceftriaxone (46%) and cefixime (15%) were found to take the lead in terms of adverse reaction frequency. The highest proportion among all adverse drug reactions caused by penicillins and cephalosporins was attributed to allergic reactions. To confirm or rule out immediate or delayed type allergies in patients, as well as in patients with a history of immediate-type allergic reactions to ß-lactams and planned administration of another ß-lactam, it is necessary to conduct skin testing (skin prick test, or, in the case of parenteral administration, intradermal test) with the planned ß-lactam antibiotic. The second highest proportion of induced adverse drug reactions was attributed to drugs affecting the cardiovascular system (20.3%). The leading medications in the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors category were enalapril (47%) and the combination of lisinopril with hydrochlorothiazide (24%). In the angiotensin II receptor blockers category of medications, valsartan (30%) and telmisartan-hydrochlorothiazide combination (20%) ranked highest. In the category of CCB drugs, amlodipine (66%) and nifedipine (20%) held the leading positions. among angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, enalapril caused the most prevalent and predicted adverse reaction, that of cough, affecting 10.5% of patients, whereas, with the combination therapy of lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide, the cough was observed in only 5.2% of patients. Angiotensin II receptor blockers have a better safety profile, particularly concerning cough. Analysis of adverse drug reactions reports for angiotensin II receptor blockers showed no cases of cough with valsartan and telmisartan-hydrochlorothiazide combination. Among calcium channel blocker medications, amlodipine emerged to rank highest, causing one of the predicted adverse drug reactions, that of lower extremity oedema in 64% of patients. The second position was taken by the combination of amlodipine with valsartan, which showed a statistically significant reduction of 14.3% (p≤0.05) in the incidence of oedema. Using amlodipine at a dose of 5 mg in combination with sartan medicines as angiotensin receptor blockers is an effective therapeutic alternative not only for enhancing blood pressure control in hypertensive patients but also for improving the safety profile of amlodipine. Among all the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs prescribed to patients in the Lviv region in 2022, the highest number of adverse reactions was associated with the administration of diclofenac, ibuprofen, paracetamol, and nimesulide, causing adverse drug reactions in 22%, 19%, 17%, and 10% of cases, respectively. The most common systemic manifestations of adverse reactions with these non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were allergic reactions (63.4%) and gastrointestinal disorders (26.8%). From an evidence-based medicine perspective, the most justified approach for primary and secondary prevention of gastrointestinal complications is the use of proton pump inhibitors.

Interventions for chronic kidney disease in people with sickle cell disease.

BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease (SCD), one of the commonest severe monogenic disorders, is caused by the inheritance of two abnormal haemoglobin (beta-globin) genes. SCD can cause severe pain, significant end-organ damage, pulmonary complications, and premature death. Kidney disease is a frequent and potentially severe complication in people with SCD. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is defined as abnormalities of kidney structure or function present for more than three months. Sickle cell nephropathy refers to the spectrum of kidney complications in SCD. Glomerular damage is a cause of microalbuminuria and can develop at an early age in children with SCD, with increased prevalence in adulthood. In people with sickle cell nephropathy, outcomes are poor as a result of the progression to proteinuria and chronic kidney insufficiency. Up to 12% of people who develop sickle cell nephropathy will develop end-stage renal disease. This is an update of a review first published in 2017. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of any intervention for preventing or reducing kidney complications or chronic kidney disease in people with sickle cell disease. Possible interventions include red blood cell transfusions, hydroxyurea, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), either alone or in combination. SEARCH METHODS: We searched for relevant trials in the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, seven other databases, and two other trials registers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing interventions to prevent or reduce kidney complications or CKD in people with SCD. We applied no restrictions related to outcomes examined, language, or publication status. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trial eligibility, extracted data, assessed the risk of bias, and assessed the certainty of the evidence (GRADE). MAIN RESULTS: We included three RCTs with 385 participants. We rated the certainty of the evidence as low to very low across different outcomes according to GRADE methodology, downgrading for risk of bias concerns, indirectness, and imprecision. Hydroxyurea versus placebo One RCT published in 2011 compared hydroxyurea to placebo in 193 children aged nine to 18 months. We are unsure if hydroxyurea compared to placebo reduces or prevents progression of kidney disease assessed by change in glomerular filtration rate (mean difference (MD) 0.58 mL/min /1.73 m2, 95% confidence interval (CI) -14.60 to 15.76; 142 participants; very low certainty). Hydroxyurea compared to placebo may improve the ability to concentrate urine (MD 42.23 mOsm/kg, 95% CI 12.14 to 72.32; 178 participants; low certainty), and may make little or no difference to SCD-related serious adverse events, including acute chest syndrome (risk ratio (RR) 0.39, 99% CI 0.13 to 1.16; 193 participants; low certainty), painful crisis (RR 0.68, 99% CI 0.45 to 1.02; 193 participants; low certainty); and hospitalisations (RR 0.83, 99% CI 0.68 to 1.01; 193 participants; low certainty). No deaths occurred in either trial arm and the RCT did not report quality of life. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors versus placebo One RCT published in 1998 compared an ACEI (captopril) to placebo in 22 adults with normal blood pressure and microalbuminuria. We are unsure if captopril compared to placebo reduces proteinuria (MD -49.00 mg/day, 95% CI -124.10 to 26.10; 22 participants; very low certainty). We are unsure if captopril reduces or prevents kidney disease as measured by creatinine clearance; the trial authors stated that creatinine clearance remained constant over six months in both groups, but provided no comparative data (very low certainty). The RCT did not report serious adverse events, all-cause mortality, or quality of life. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors versus vitamin C One RCT published in 2020 compared an ACEI (lisinopril) with vitamin C in 170 children aged one to 18 years with normal blood pressure and microalbuminuria. It reported no data we could analyse. We are unsure if lisinopril compared to vitamin C reduces proteinuria in this population: the large drop in microalbuminuria in both arms of the trial after only one month on treatment may have been due to an overestimation of microalbuminuria at baseline rather than a true effect. The RCT did not report serious adverse events, all-cause mortality, or quality of life. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We are unsure if hydroxyurea improves glomerular filtration rate or reduces hyperfiltration in children aged nine to 18 months, but it may improve their ability to concentrate urine and may make little or no difference to the incidence of acute chest syndrome, painful crises, and hospitalisations. We are unsure if ACEI compared to placebo has any effect on preventing or reducing kidney complications in adults with normal blood pressure and microalbuminuria. We are unsure if ACEI compared to vitamin C has any effect on preventing or reducing kidney complications in children with normal blood pressure and microalbuminuria. No RCTs assessed red blood cell transfusions or any combined interventions to prevent or reduce kidney complications. Due to lack of evidence, we cannot comment on the management of children aged over 18 months or adults with any known genotype of SCD. We have identified a lack of adequately designed and powered studies, although we found four ongoing trials since the last version of this review. Only one ongoing trial addresses renal function as a primary outcome in the short term, but such interventions have long-term effects. Trials of hydroxyurea, ACEIs or red blood cell transfusion in older children and adults are urgently needed to determine any effect on prevention or reduction of kidney complications in people with SCD.

Heterogeneity in Blood Pressure Response to 4 Antihypertensive Drugs: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Hypertension is the leading risk factor for premature death worldwide. Multiple blood pressure-lowering therapies are available but the potential for maximizing benefit by personalized targeting of drug classes is unknown. Objective: To investigate and quantify the potential for targeting specific drugs to specific individuals to maximize blood pressure effects. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized, double-blind, repeated crossover trial in men and women with grade 1 hypertension at low risk for cardiovascular events at an outpatient research clinic in Sweden. Mixed-effects models were used to assess the extent to which individuals responded better to one treatment than another and to estimate the additional blood pressure lowering achievable by personalized treatment. Interventions: Each participant was scheduled for treatment in random order with 4 different classes of blood pressure-lowering drugs (lisinopril [angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor], candesartan [angiotensin-receptor blocker], hydrochlorothiazide [thiazide], and amlodipine [calcium channel blocker]), with repeated treatments for 2 classes. Main Outcomes and Measures: Ambulatory daytime systolic blood pressure, measured at the end of each treatment period. Results: There were 1468 completed treatment periods (median length, 56 days) recorded in 270 of the 280 randomized participants (54% men; mean age, 64 years). The blood pressure response to different treatments varied considerably between individuals (P < .001), specifically for the choices of lisinopril vs hydrochlorothiazide, lisinopril vs amlodipine, candesartan vs hydrochlorothiazide, and candesartan vs amlodipine. Large differences were excluded for the choices of lisinopril vs candesartan and hydrochlorothiazide vs amlodipine. On average, personalized treatment had the potential to provide an additional 4.4 mm Hg-lower systolic blood pressure. Conclusions and Relevance: These data reveal substantial heterogeneity in blood pressure response to drug therapy for hypertension, findings that may have implications for personalized therapy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02774460.

Use of Naloxone in Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Overdose: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor overdose is an uncommonly presenting toxicologic emergency. Management is primarily supportive care, but a small body of evidence exists to support naloxone for management of hypotension. CASE REPORT: We present a case of accidental ACE inhibitor overdose. The patient took approximately 300 mg lisinopril over 48 h and presented for evaluation of syncope. He was hypotensive and unresponsive to fluids. We administered naloxone with immediate and sustained resolution in hypotension. The mechanism of action is briefly discussed. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY MEDICINE PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Naloxone is a rapid, low-risk, low-cost, and effective intervention for hypotension due to ACE inhibitor toxicity. It is supported by basic science research and clinical experience.

Oral combined hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril vs nifedipine for postpartum hypertension: a comparative-effectiveness pilot randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and diuretics may be underutilized for postpartum hypertension because of their teratogenicity during pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated whether combined oral hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril therapy produced superior short-term blood pressure control when compared with nifedipine among postpartum individuals with hypertension requiring pharmacologic treatment. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a pilot randomized controlled trial (October 2021 to June 2022) that included individuals with chronic hypertension or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy with 2 systolic blood pressure measurements ≥150 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure measurements ≥100 mm Hg within 72 hours after delivery. Participants were randomized to receive either combined hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril therapy or nifedipine therapy after stratifying the participants by diagnosis (chronic hypertension vs hypertensive disorders of pregnancy). The primary outcome was stage 2 hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg) determined using a home blood pressure monitor on days 7 to 10 after delivery or at readmission to the hospital for blood pressure control. The secondary outcomes included severe maternal morbidity (any of the following: intensive care unit admission; hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count syndrome; eclampsia; stroke; cardiomyopathy; or maternal death), need for intravenous medications after randomization, hospital length of stay, blood pressure during first clinic visit, medication compliance, and adverse events. A pilot trial with 70 individuals was planned given the limited available data on combined hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril therapy use in postpartum care. We calculated relative risks and 95% credible intervals in an intention-to-treat analysis. Finally, we conducted a preplanned Bayesian analysis to estimate the probability of benefit or harm with a neutral informative prior. RESULTS: Of 111 eligible individuals, 70 (63%) agreed and were randomized (31 in the hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril group and 36 in the nifedipine group; 3 withdrew consent after randomization), and the characteristics were similar at baseline between the groups. The primary outcome was unavailable for 9 (12.8%) participants. The primary outcome occurred in 27% of participants in the hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril group and in 43% of the participants in the nifedipine group (posterior adjusted relative risk, 0.74; 95% credible interval, 0.40-1.31). Bayesian analysis indicated an 85% posterior probability of a reduction in the primary outcome with combined hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril therapy relative to nifedipine treatment. No differences were noted in the secondary outcomes or adverse medication events. CONCLUSION: The results of the pilot trial suggest a high probability that combined hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril therapy produces superior short-term BP control when compared with nifedipine. These findings should be confirmed in a larger trial.

Effects of candesartan on cerebral microvascular function in mild cognitive impairment: Results of two clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral microvascular dysfunction is commonly seen in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular cognitive impairment (VCI). Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) to CO2 reflects cerebral microvascular health and may be modulated by the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). This study aimed to investigate the effects of RAS modulation on CVR in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to underlying vascular or AD etiologies. METHODS: This study presents findings of candesartan's effects on the secondary outcomes of two double-blind randomized clinical trials of 12-month therapy of candesartan versus lisinopril in VCI (CALIBREX (Candesartan vs Lisinopril Effects on the Brain and Endothelial Function in Executive MCI)) and candesartan versus placebo in prodromal AD (Candesartan's Effects on Alzheimer's Disease and Related Biomarkers (CEDAR)). Primary outcome results of these trials have been reported in previous publications. Participants underwent identical brain blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD)-CVR in response to a 2-min CO2 challenge at baseline and 12 months. Regions of interest and voxel-wise CVR maps were derived from BOLD signal changes during CO2 challenge. CVR effects were compared between candesartan and lisinopril (CALIBREX) and candesartan and placebo (CEDAR) using mixed-model repeated measures. RESULTS: Data from 102 participants in the CALIBREX study (mean age = 65 years, 45% female, 63% African American) and 59 in the CEDAR study (mean age = 67 years, 32% female, 20% African American) were analyzed. Candesartan was associated with improved whole brain CVR compared to placebo in the CEDAR study (adjusted within-group mean difference for candesartan = 0.27 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.006, 0.53) vs placebo = -0.17 (95% CI = 0.42, 0.08), p-value = 0.018), and compared to lisinopril in the CALIBREX study (adjusted within-group mean difference for candesartan = 0.28 (95% CI = 0.10, 0.46) vs lisinopril = -0.08 (95% CI = -0.31, 0.14), p-value = 0.012), independent of blood pressure. In an exploratory meta-analysis of the two trials, improved CVR in the hippocampus was linked to improved attention and working memory (p = 0.044) and a trend for improved executive function (p = 0.087) with candesartan therapy. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that candesartan is associated with improved microvascular function in MCI, and these findings are independent of its blood pressure effect in these VCI and prodromal AD populations.

L-arginine and lisinopril supplementation protects against sodium fluoride-induced nephrotoxicity and hypertension by suppressing mineralocorticoid receptor and angiotensin-converting enzyme 3 activity.

Sodium fluoride (NaF) is one of the neglected environmental toxicants that has continued to silently cause toxicity to both humans and animals. NaF is universally present in water, soil, and atmosphere. The persistent and alarming rate of increase in cardiovascular and renal diseases caused by chemicals such as NaF in mammalian tissues has led to the use of various drugs for the treatment of these diseases. The present study aimed at evaluating the renoprotective and antihypertensive effects of L-arginine against NaF-induced nephrotoxicity. Thirty male Wistar rats (150-180 g) were used in this study. The rats were randomly divided into five groups of six rats each as follows: Control, NaF (300 ppm), NaF + L-arginine (100 mg/kg), NaF + L-arginine (200 mg/kg), and NaF + lisinopril (10 mg/kg). Histopathological examination and immunohistochemistry of renal angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and mineralocorticoid receptor (MCR) were performed. Markers of renal damage, oxidative stress, antioxidant defense system, and blood pressure parameters were determined. L-arginine and lisinopril significantly (P < 0.05) ameliorated the hypertensive effects of NaF. The systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressure of the treated groups were significantly (P < 0.05) reduced compared with the hypertensive group. This finding was concurrent with significantly increased serum bioavailability of nitric oxide in the hypertensive rats treated with L-arginine and lisinopril. Also, there was a significant reduction in the level of blood urea nitrogen and creatinine of hypertensive rats treated with L-arginine and lisinopril. There was a significant (P < 0.05) reduction in markers of oxidative stress such as malondialdehyde and protein carbonyl and concurrent increase in the levels of antioxidant enzymes in the kidney of hypertensive rats treated with L-arginine and lisinopril. The results of this study suggest that L-arginine and lisinopril normalized blood pressure, reduced oxidative stress, and the expression of renal ACE and mineralocorticoid receptor, and improved nitric oxide production. Thus, L-arginine holds promise as a potential therapy against hypertension and renal damage.

EFFECTIVENESS OF LISINOPRIL AND AMLODIPINE COMBINATION AT HYPERTENSION WITH COMORBIDITY OF ARTERIOSCLEROSIS OBLITERANS IN GENERAL PRACTICE.

OBJECTIVE: The aim: To analyze the dynamics of daily monitoring of blood pressure, intracardiac (according to echocardiography), peripheral hemodynamics (according to ultrasound of the vessels of the lower extremity), the thickness of the intima-media complex (according to carotid sonography) in patients with hypertension the effect of treatment with a combination of lisinopril and amlodipine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: The study included 40 patients with hypertension with 2 (29 patients) and 3 (11 patients) degrees of hypertension in combination with AOLE with I-III stages of chronic insufficiency of the lower extremity, which revealed hyperkinetic, eukinetic, and hypokinetic types of hypertension with a predominance of the sympathetic nervous system. The groups are comparable in age, sex, duration of hypertension, and medications received in the previous stages. For antihypertensive therapy, the most common drugs for use were selected - lisinopril + amplodipine in fixed doses of 10 and 5 mg, respectively. If after 2 weeks we did not reduce the mean level of SBP and DBP by 10% or more from baseline, we doubled the dose of lisinopril without changing the dose of amlodipine. RESULTS: Results: After 6 months of treatment, in particular, an increase in the pulse index - by 24.8%, a decrease in the resistance index - by 21.1%, an increase in linear and volumetric blood velocity - by 25.6% and 27.4%, respectively, while achieving the target blood pressure. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: It is proved that in the absence of individual contraindications the combination of lisinopril and amlodipine is optimal and universal for effective treatment of patients with hypertension in combination with AOLE in all types of central hemodynamics.

The Correlation between Two Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor's Concentrations and Cognition.

Both lisinopril and enalapril are angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) drugs and widely used in the treatment of hypertension. Enalapril does not cross the blood-brain barrier, but lisinopril is centrally active. Our goal was to find out if there was a link between the actual concentration of ACE inhibitors and cognition and if there was a detectable difference between the two types of ACE inhibitors. Asymptomatic, non-treated patients were diagnosed by screening and the hypertension was confirmed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). A battery of cognitive tests was used to assess the impact of randomly assigning participants to receive either lisinopril or enalapril. All neurocognitive functions were measured, especially the most affected by conditions of compromised perfusion pressures, such as hypertension, which are attention and executive functions. The lisinopril concentration showed a significant inverse correlation with mosaic test (coeff. = -0.5779) and seemed to have a significant negative effect on perceptual motor skills (coeff. = -0.5779), complex attention (coeff. = -0.5104) and learning (coeff. = -0.5202). Compared with enalapril, lisinopril is less successful in improving the components of cognitive functions.

Recurrent biventricular takotsubo cardiomyopathy with fatal outcome.

A woman in her 60s presented initially with nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain. She rapidly progressed to respiratory failure requiring intubation. ECG demonstrated no significant ST segment changes. Troponin I and brain natriuretic peptide were elevated. Chest CT angiography demonstrated small non-occlusive segmental pulmonary emboli. Transthoracic echocardiogram findings suggested biventricular takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TCM) with left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 20%. She improved with aggressive management and was discharged on carvedilol, lisinopril, atorvastatin and apixaban. Follow-up echocardiogram revealed complete resolution of the left and right ventricular wall motion abnormalities at 9 weeks. She had symptoms recurrence after 7 months from the initial presentation. Repeated echocardiogram was consistent with biventricular TCM recurrence. Despite aggressive medical therapy, multiorgan failure developed and patient care was later transitioned to palliative care.

Antihypertensive medicine use differs between Ghana and Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: Non-communicable diseases are a growing burden in many African countries; cardiovascular disease is the main disease. Antihypertensive medicines (AHM) are a common treatment option but we know little about community use in most low- and medium-income countries (LMIC). We aimed to describe the use of antihypertensive medicines (AHM) in Ghana and Nigeria using a novel data source. METHODS: We used data from mPharma-a health and pharmaceutical company which distributes pharmaceuticals to hospital and retail pharmacies. We extracted data using the anatomical therapeutic chemical (ATC) classification codes and calculated use in defined daily doses and explored patterns by class, medicines, dose, and originator or generic product. RESULTS: AHM use differed between Ghana and Nigeria. The most used classes in Ghana were angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) followed by calcium channel blockers (CCB) and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEi). The five most used products were 16 mg candesartan, 30 mg nifedipine, 10 mg lisinopril, 5 mg amlodipine and 50 mg losartan. In Nigeria ARB, CCB and diuretics were widely used; the top five products were 50 mg losartan, 10 mg lisinopril, 30 mg nifedipine, 40 mg furosemide, and 5 mg amlodipine. More originator products were used in Ghana than Nigeria. CONCLUSION: The differences between Ghana and Nigeria may result from a combination of medical, contextual and policy evidence and reflect factors related to clinical guidance (e.g. standard treatment guidelines), accessibility to prescribers and the role of community pharmacies, and structure of the health system and universal health coverage including funding for medicines. We show the feasibility of using novel data sources to gain insights on medicines use in the community.

Choice of antihypertensive agent in isolated systolic hypertension and isolated diastolic hypertension: A secondary analysis of the ALLHAT trial.

Despite broad treatment recommendations, there are limited published reports comparing the efficacy of different antihypertensive agents in patients with isolated systolic hypertension or isolated diastolic hypertension. This study was a secondary analysis of the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial. We compared the use of chlorthalidone, amlodipine, or lisinopril on the primary outcome of combined coronary heart disease, stroke, or all-cause mortality in patients with isolated systolic hypertension or isolated diastolic hypertension.

Homoarginine treatment of rats improves cardiac function and remodeling in response to pressure overload.

Low serum concentrations of the amino acid homoarginine (HA) are associated with increased cardiovascular mortality by incompletely understood mechanisms. This study sought to assess the influence of HA on cardiac remodeling in rats undergoing either transaortic banding or inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis by Nω-Nitro-L-arginine methyl ester hydrochloride (L-NAME). Male Wistar rats (n = 136) underwent sham operation (SH) or aortic banding (AB). Both groups were equally divided into 14 subgroups, receiving different doses of HA alone or in combination with lisinopril, spironolactone, or L-NAME for 4 weeks. HA treatment in AB animals resulted in a dose-dependent improvement of cardiac function up to a concentration of 800 mg·kg-1 ·day-1 . Combining 800 mg·kg-1 ·day-1 HA with spironolactone or lisinopril yielded additional effects, showing a positive correlation with LV ejection fraction (+33%, p = 0.0002) and fractional shortening (+41%, p = 0.0014). An inverse association was observed with collagen area fraction (-41%, p < 0.0001), myocyte cross-sectional area (-22%, p < 0.0001) and the molecular markers atrial natriuretic factor (-74%, p = 0.0091), brain natriuretic peptide (-42%, p = 0.0298), beta-myosin heavy chain (-46%, p = 0.0411), and collagen type V alpha 1 chain (-73%, p = 0.0257) compared to placebo-treated AB animals. Co-administration of HA and L-NAME was found to attenuate cardiac remodeling and prevent NO-deficient hypertension following AB. HA treatment has led to a dose-dependent improvement of myocardial function and marked histological and molecular changes in cardiac remodeling following AB. Combining HA with standard heart failure medication resulted in additional beneficial effects boosting its direct impact on heart failure pathophysiology.

Targeting inflammation and redox perturbations by lisinopril mitigates Freund's adjuvant-induced arthritis in rats: role of JAK-2/STAT-3/RANKL axis, MMPs, and VEGF.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disorders are major complications of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Hence, finding effective agents that can target RA progression and its cardiovascular consequences is demanding. The present work aimed to explore the potential of lisinopril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, to mitigate adjuvant's-induced arthritis with emphasis on the pro-inflammatory signals, articular degradation cues, and angiogenesis alongside JAK-2/STAT-3 and Nrf2/HO-1 pathways. METHODS: Lisinopril (10 mg/kg/day) was administered by oral gavage for 3 weeks and the target signals were examined by biochemical assays, ELISA, histopathology, immunoblotting, and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Lisinopril attenuated the progression of arthritis as proven by lowering paw edema, arthritic index, and gait scores alongside diminishing the immune-cell infiltration/aberrant histopathology in the dorsal pouch lining. These favorable actions were associated with curtailing the production of inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1ß, and IL-17) and the pro-inflammatory angiotensin II alongside upregulating the anti-inflammatory angiotensin-(1-7) in the hind paw of arthritic rats. At the molecular level, lisinopril inhibited the upstream JAK-2/STAT-3 pathway by downregulating the protein expression of p-JAK-2/total JAK-2 and p-STAT-3/total STAT-3 ratio and the nuclear levels of NF-κBp65. Meanwhile, lisinopril curbed the downstream cartilage degradation signals matrix metalloproteinases (MMP-3 and MMP-9) and the bone erosion cue RANKL. Equally important, the protein expression of the angiogenesis signal VEGF was downregulated in the hind paw/dorsal lining. With respect to oxidative stress, lisinopril suppressed the paw lipid peroxides and boosted GSH and Nrf-2/HO-1 pathway. CONCLUSION: Lisinopril attenuated adjuvant-induced arthritis via inhibition of inflammation, articular degradation cues, and angiogenesis.

Comparative Study to Characterise the Pharmaceutical Potential of Synthesised Snake Venom Bradykinin-Potentiating Peptides In Vivo.

BACKGROUND: Bradykinin-potentiating peptides (BPPs) are snake venom peptides inhibiting the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE). ACE plays an important role in the regulation of blood pressure. BPPs lead to the development of ACE inhibitors for the treatment of hypertension. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present work was to carry out a comprehensive comparative study of four synthesised snake venom BPPs in vivo. METHODS: Four synthesised snake venom BPPs were administered to rats via the intraperitoneal route for 15 days at a fixed dose. Lisinopril was used as a comparative standard. Thirty male albino rats were divided into six groups: A, B, C, D, E (lisinopril), and F (control). Group F was maintained as the control group and given only saline. After 15 days, blood samples and tissues were removed for the study of selective biochemical parameters and histomorphometric analysis. Statistical evaluation of all results was also performed. RESULTS: The results indicated that peptide I, with the sequence ZSAPGNEAIPP, was highly toxic and adversely affected all the biochemical and histological parameters studied in this work. Peptide II (ZNWPHPQIPP) and peptide IV (ZQWAQGRAPHPP) showed lower toxicity. None of the BPPs raised the serum creatinine level and exhibited nephroprotective effects. Although lisinopril raised the creatinine level, it showed a protective role towards the pancreas and lungs in parallel. CONCLUSION: The present work shows that although there is a high sequence similarity between the four BPPs, their in vivo activity varies. The sequences of peptide II and peptide IV can be used to improve the design of current ACE inhibitors used for hypertension treatment.

Pharmacologic ACE-Inhibition Mitigates Radiation-Induced Pneumonitis by Suppressing ACE-Expressing Lung Myeloid Cells.

PURPOSE: Radiation-induced lung injury is a major dose-limiting toxicity for thoracic radiation therapy patients. In experimental models, treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors mitigates radiation pneumonitis; however, the mechanism of action is not well understood. Here, we evaluate the direct role of ACE inhibition on lung immune cells. METHODS AND MATERIALS: ACE expression and activity were determined in the lung immune cell compartment of irradiated adult rats after either high dose fractionated radiation therapy to the right lung (5 fractions × 9 Gy) or a single dose of 13.5 Gy partial body irradiation. Mitigation of radiation-induced pneumonitis with the ACE-inhibitor lisinopril was evaluated in the 13.5 Gy rat partial body irradiation model. During pneumonitis, we characterized inflammation and immune cell content in the lungs and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. In vitro mechanistic studies were performed using primary human monocytes and the human monocytic THP-1 cell line. RESULTS: In both the partial body irradiation and fractionated radiation therapy models, radiation increased ACE activity in lung immune cells. Treatment with lisinopril improved survival during radiation pneumonitis (P = .0004). Lisinopril abrogated radiation-induced increases in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (chemokine ligand 2) and MIP-1a cytokine levels (P < .0001). Treatment with lisinopril reduced both ACE expression (P = .006) and frequency of CD45+ CD11b+ lung myeloid cells (P = .004). In vitro, radiation injury acutely increased ACE activity (P = .045) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation (P = .004) in human monocytes, whereas treatment with lisinopril blocked radiation-induced increases in both ACE and ROS. Radiation-induced ROS generation was blocked by pharmacologic inhibition of either NADPH oxidase 2 (P = .012) or the type 1 angiotensin receptor (P = .013). CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate radiation-induced ACE activation within the immune compartment promotes the pathogenesis of radiation pneumonitis, while ACE inhibition suppresses activation of proinflammatory immune cell subsets. Mechanistically, our in vitro data demonstrate radiation directly activates the ACE/type 1 angiotensin receptor pathway in immune cells and promotes generation of ROS via NADPH oxidase 2.

Lisinopril prevents bullous pemphigoid induced by dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors via the Mas receptor pathway.

Recent studies have suggested that dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors increase the risk of development of bullous pemphigoid (BP), which is the most common autoimmune blistering skin disease; however, the associated mechanisms remain unclear, and thus far, no therapeutic targets responsible for drug-induced BP have been identified. Therefore, we used clinical data mining to identify candidate drugs that can suppress DPP4 inhibitor-associated BP, and we experimentally examined the underlying molecular mechanisms using human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (hPBMCs). A search of the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System and the IBM® MarketScan® Research databases indicated that DPP4 inhibitors increased the risk of BP, and that the concomitant use of lisinopril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, significantly decreased the incidence of BP in patients receiving DPP4 inhibitors. Additionally, in vitro experiments with hPBMCs showed that DPP4 inhibitors upregulated mRNA expression of MMP9 and ACE2, which are responsible for the pathophysiology of BP in monocytes/macrophages. Furthermore, lisinopril and Mas receptor (MasR) inhibitors suppressed DPP4 inhibitor-induced upregulation of MMP9. These findings suggest that the modulation of the renin-angiotensin system, especially the angiotensin1-7/MasR axis, is a therapeutic target in DPP4 inhibitor-associated BP.